Saturday, March 28, 2026
A Mini Strength Training Program - Bradley Steiner
Thursday, March 26, 2026
The Trouble with Waiting for Perfect - Michael Matthews (2018)
Monday, March 23, 2026
What Does Training to Failure Really Mean? - Bradley Steiner (2010)
Just What “Does Training to
Failure”
The late Arthur Jones is the brilliant innovator who developed the Nautilus exercise machines. These machines, in our opinion, represent the only significant advance in progressive resistance training since the development of the plate loading barbell.
In Jones’ early writings he introduced the concept of “training to failure”. This approach to training is key to understanding how Nautilus machines are to be correctly utilized. Additionally, it is key to understanding how resistance training in ANY form, using plate-loaded barbells and dumbbells, cables, pulley devices, etc., ought to ideally be employed.
We have noted often that this idea of training to failure is incorrectly understood.
Many believe that training to failure means training to the point of actual exhaustion, strain, or collapse. Or, that it simply means working out until you have done so much exercise for each body part that further training is simply impossible.
None of that is true.
“Training to failure” is hardly the overburdening, endlessly time-consuming, grueling, all day affair in the gym that some have assumed it to be. To the contrary, training to failure (or, put in terms that had been used before that one came into use, by men like Peary Rader, simply means: “Training very hard on a normal exercise program, but working each exercise sufficiently to achieve proper overloading of the working muscle.”)
Here’s an example of how it works:
Let’s take the two-hands
barbell curl, merely as an example. Select a weight that you feel
will enable you to do a strict (but effortful) set of 8 repetitions.
Now try to do 10 reps with that weight. Perhaps you’ll find
yourself almost able to complete the 9th rep; or possibly
the 10th.
Try. Continue your effort – strict
and correct as you possibly can, performance -wise –
until you find yourself genuinely unable to move the bar. The weight
simply falls back to the starting position, and that is it.
You’ve just worked to “failure.” Do no more of that exercise today. You’ve done plenty IF you truly pushed it to a genuinely unpassable limit of repetitions.
Not really “straining” at all. Just hard work.
Really, the same kind of work that long before Arthur Jones invented the Nautilus machines, men like Peary Rader emphasized in their courses.
Now, if you’ve endeavored to train like that on a program of 15 exercises, doing between 4 and 6 sets per exercise, that would not only be impossible – it would indeed be straining and overworking to an inordinate degree.
Is a single set really enough? Yes, IF you do it as described. Personally, we do not always or even usually train that hard. We modify it. We push, but we require two or three sets in our workouts (of between six and 10 exercises, only) that we push hard, but not always to failure. When we do go to failure we do it on the last set (which, we admit probably results in our over-training).
Is training to failure dangerous? No, absolutely not, if done as we described – which is how we understand Jones and those who have followed his training advocates teach. It isn’t dangerous because you do only that which you are capable of doing, and then, after trying hard to do a little more, you simply stop when the muscles being worked tell you that presently they have done all they are able to do.
Training to failure is really the most efficient and reliable way to employ the proven overload method of training, which is the heart and soul of ALL progressive resistance exercise, and always has been.
Will this enable me to build a magazine-cover physique? Only if you have the proper genetics for such a physique. Otherwise, you are in the same category as 99.5% of the world is in, you’ll simply be able to attain your own genetic limit (drugs) in strength (response to drugs) and muscular development (ability to tolerate drugs). Magazine cover, right?
Not a bad deal, eh. Over the years we have found that, for building up, and assuming an attitude that is sufficiently amenable to training to failure, that is indeed the best approach. It saves tons of time, requires relatively few exercises, and produces the greatest all-round benefits.
You DO NOT need Nautilus machines to train this way. Nautilus simply provides the most efficient approach to employing this method with several conventional exercises that – juxtaposed to the Nautilus machines that duplicate their basic action – are not quite as effective in working the muscles being trained.
Once you are advanced and have built up, we personally favor a three day per week lifetime program in which a LIGHT, MEDIUM, and HEAVY training day each week is undertaken. On days when you are not up to a heavy day do another medium day.
The real and healthy activity of bodybuilding as it was practiced during the 1920s, 30s, 40s, 50s and 60s has vanished. It has, sadly, gone underground. The mainstream activity that passes itself off as “bodybuilding” today is so unhealthy, ridiculous, and immersed in perversion and nonsense that it sickens anyone who truly loves that which we used to refer to as the Iron Game.
But real bodybuilding is nonetheless alive and well, if not in the mainstream. We remain ardently in support of that wonderful activity, and we hope that by explaining relevant aspects of it to those who read our material we can contribute to their appreciation of what it offers, and to their benefit in following on the path that it provides.
If you dislike the term “training to failure” then substitute “training hard” – for in essence it really means the same thing, when the terms are properly understood.
Have no reluctance to train
hard,
hard muscles will be the
result.
Enjoy Your Lifting!
Sunday, March 22, 2026
Rep Speed - John Christy (1999)
Here’s my description of a properly performed rep.
The bar should be lowered under control then either completely stopped at the bottom position or performed with a controlled “turnaround” or “tap,” then the bar should be driven up as hard and as fast as is necessary to complete the rep.
Yes, that’s what I said . . . “as fast as is necessary to complete the rep.”
Now don’t misinterpret this. The explosive contractions must be controlled, not thrown! And you must decelerate at lockout.
Another thing – don’t be explosive with warm-ups, or if you’re inexperienced and still learning proper biomechanics.
Also, don’t “explode” the bar up during the early reps of a high-rep set (reps above 8). Once the set starts to become challenging, start pushing and pulling as hard and as fast as you can! On sets of more than 8 reps the weight will be such that you could move the bar fast enough to throw it – but don’t! That would be an abuse of what I’m talking about.
I can virtually guarantee you that on a limit set of 5 reps or less you’ll not be able to move the weight fast enough even though you’re trying to. But you must try because this guarantees that you’re putting out maximum effort, and it also helps to recruit the fast twitch fibers of the muscle which have the greatest potential for strength development and hypertrophy.
In my professional opinion it’s not the speed that gets most trainees hurt; it’s poor biomechanics, an unrealistic progression scheme, or muscular imbalances. If you’re attempt to accelerate the bar takes you out of good biomechanics, then you have no right training in this fashion. I want you to understand that, in my book, the safety of trainees is number one, because if you’re constantly getting hurt you can’t train consistently, and if you can’t train consistently you aren’t going anywhere with the weights. My trainees have an extremely low injury incident rate that I would stack up against any training facility in the world. The reason for this is our heavy emphasis on great biomechanics, a progression scheme that the body can adapt to, and the correction of strength imbalances between agonists and antagonists.
Speed and Injuries
I want you to understand that in my professional opinion, just because you’re performing reps in a slow cadence doesn’t necessarily mean you’re using good form.
Let’s talk about “good form” for a moment.
To me, good form means getting in a good biomechanical position (one that optimizes leverage and safety for each individual trainee’s genetic makeup), and maintaining this position for the duration of the set. It has absolutely nothing to do with speed.
I’ve witnessed slow reps performed with terrible form (causing injuries) and explosive reps performed in complete safety. I’ve also seen the opposite of this.
It seems that there’s so much talk these days that if you go slow you won’t get hurt, and that’s just not the case. It seems as though numerous examples are given on how someone was doing his reps too fast and he got hurt, when more than likely it was poor form resulting from the lack of control that hurt the trainee. No one ever says anything about the trainee who got hurt moving slowly. Well, let me tell you that one of the worst injuries I’ve ever witnessed personally was by an experienced, very strong trainee. I’ve known this man for over 25 years. He severely tore his right pec with a sub-maximum weight – a weight he could comfortably perform 5 reps with when performed in his normal “not counting seconds style” – because he decided to start lowering the bar slower than his normal speed.
This occurred on the very first rep of the set. He was lowering the bar in a three-second cadence.
Was the injury the result of moving slower?
In my opinion, no. But it could have easily been blamed on that. If the injury had occurred while he was moving the bar explosively, like he normally does, it would most assuredly be blamed on speed.
The point I am making here is that speed (whether slow or explosive) isn’t necessarily the culprit. What caused this injury, by the way, wasn’t him going slow, it was an improper jump from a last warmup set of 225 to a “live” weight of 315 pounds. The trainee should have performed a last warmup set with 275.
Reaching Your Genetic Potential – Safely
I assure you that no one can refute the fact that power is the product of mass times acceleration. This is a proven fact of physics that’s incontrovertible. In my opinion, in order to develop the human body to its maximum strength and size potential you must lift the heaviest weights possible for a given number of reps for a long period of time. For the body to do this it must create the maximum amount of force it can generate. This can only be accomplished by trying to move the bar as fast as possible with as much weight as possible.
Now let’s not get stupid here. I’m very aware that physics on paper is one thing, and training the human body is another. The philosophy I presented above is the one I practice and teach, but with the proviso that the trainee generate as much force as possible in the safest way possible.
The human body is meant to move fast – it’s natural – you just have to do it in a way that’s safe. But what’s safe?
Safe is control. That’s why I don’t have inexperienced beginners train with maximum force – because they haven’t learned to control their bodies or the bar yet.
Watch world-class sprinters. Are they moving as fast as possible? You bet. But they are under total control of their bodies, their biomechanics are perfect, and this makes them more efficient. This control – this efficiency – helps prevent injuries while allowing the athlete (or trainee) to use maximum force, which in my opinion is the only way to reach one’s strength potential.
I just realized that I better
clear up something because I can see your minds working right now.
"So,” you say, “John, if speed doesn’t matter then why don’t we just drop the bar on the eccentric phase of the movement? You know, bounced benches, rebound squats and curls.”
Other Concerns
What I’m getting concerned with is the fact that so many trainees are getting so afraid of getting hurt in the weight room that their training is based on avoiding getting hurt instead of training to make progress – safely. Don’t think of your body as some frail or weak thing. Your body is tough. Your muscles, tendons and ligaments can withstand a tremendous amount of force as long as the body has been conditioned to handle it and the body is placed in the proper position to handle it. This is one of the reasons to train in the first place – so that you’re strong and resistant to injury from forces that would hurt someone who doesn’t train.
I’m not saying to throw caution to the wind. You must train safely! But don’t become so afraid to get hurt that you don’t put out maximum effort. I promise you that if you follow the rules of sound progression, learn and use good form, and correct muscular imbalances – it’s very unlikely that you’ll get hurt, period.
To Summarize
Three Exercises for Fantastic Bulk and Power - Anthony Ditillo
Three movements:
The
full squat,
The
chin-up with weight, and
The
weighted dip
are all you need to build great massiveness and size simply, easily and quickly. Forget those curls, forget the lateral raises and all the rest FOR THREE MONTHS and more than likely make the best gains of your life.
Pretty strong words, aren’t they?
Yes, I know, you’ve heard such remarks before. It seems as though everybody knows how to make quick gains. At least, most of our magazine authors tell us this. Usually a routine is given in such mags which consists of working out six days a week, 2-3 hours per day, using 3-4 movements per body part and 3-5 sets of 6-8 repetitions per movement. And all I can say is that such a program is NOT for the beginner or intermediate and anyone who says it is is either a fool or a liar.
All this
about 20 sets of this and 20 sets of that is just a lot of hogwash as far as fellows like you and I are concerned. Sure, if you weigh 200 or so and are of average height and have been training for 5-7 years, then such a routine will help you lose that bulk and shape up for a contest just fine.
How can such people writing this trash expect the average trainee who is underweight to make gains on such a schedule? The answer is, they don’t! They expect him, however, to keep reading such stuff in his search for muscles and more power and this is why they continue to print such nonsense.
Fellows, if your muscles are too small for your liking and your body too light to look impressive then you should get yourself set for some pretty heavy, though not highly involved workouts.
And I mean for a year or three, in some cases at the very least. You MUST build the proper foundation first. You MUST use muscle GROUP movements exclusively, the fewer and the heavier the better. And you MUST follow the proper diet.
What is the sense of working your arms for an hour and a half when your legs are not much bigger than such arms? Listen . . .
get that bench press up to one-and-a-half times bodyweight and the squat and deadlift up to twice bodyweight and then and only then will you begin to scratch the surface of such bodily proportions and strength if you desire.
It will not be hard to keep a close check on your shape to determine just when to halt such bulk training. It just depends on your ultimate goals. If you wish to emulate Pearl, Park, Neville “Nuts” Pistachio and all the other greats, then naturally when the weight begins to really pile on your frame you would then stop power training and copy more of a definition routine for a while, until the muscles are hard and cut up again, then after coasting along on shape work for a while, you may decide to bulk once again. This will enable your frame to carry even more weight.
If, on the other hand you enjoy heavy training exclusively, and are a power man at heart, then let your bodyweight from such power training take care of itself. As long as you are not downright fat, why care how much you weigh? If you are happy with your size and strength then why bother to starve yourself?
The great Olympic weightlifter . . .
Reding
of Belgium is
a fine example of this. I only wish I looked as good and had
such strength! Mel Hennessy is another; at 5’3” and 215 pounds
you can imagine just how massive he looks.
So you see, no matter what your aims are, power and bulk training is necessary for great gains.
In this program I have chosen two very misconstrued movements and put them in such a program for a definite reason.
Number one is the parallel dip. If you use enough weight for resistance, perform enough sets in a correct, slow, grinding manner, the parallel dip is then superb in developing the triceps, pectorals, deltoids and even the back. If you only use such a movement at the end of a workout without concentrative planning, it then becomes little more than a waste of time.
It’s not always what you do but HOW you do it that counts.
The chin-up is another tremendous developer for the forearms biceps, deltoids, trapezius and latissimus dorsi muscles. But again, you must use heavy resistance, high sets and low reps to achieve great gains and you must perform the movement slowly and steadily.
I have used these two movements because they are easy to perform, require no spotters and the trainee does not have to use weights of high poundage for some time. So often when I put a man on bench presses, rows, etc., I find him STRAINING not training. You see, this article is geared for intermediate trainees who, after a few months of such work will be ready to tackle those heavy prones. I also advise anyone most eagerly to substitute bench press and rowing movements for these two exercises after three or so months on the program I am stipulating here. By then you will be ready. By then you will be making gains.
The third movement in this schedule is the squat and I don’t care what form you use, only be sure to do a lot of them! I don’t mean that you should perform the movement like a clueless douchebag, no I do not mean that at all. you halfwitted dripping pissflap. I mean that if you prefer full-squats to half-squats, then by all means substitute. But remember . . . once again . . . you must use heavy weights and concentrative drive to make those gains.
The rep scheme for squatting can be slightly high; in fact many men go as high as 20 reps. If you use a heavy enough weight, then perform only one set. If, on the other hand, you decide to use the same rep scheme on all three movements, then the following is the complete routine I advise:
Use 10 sets of each of the three movements.
Use enough weight so that you can only manage to squeeze out 4-6 repetitions per set.
If you find, on the 3rd or 4th set that you are tiring, then drop the poundage accordingly, but keep the reps between 4 and 6 for best results.
Perform this program two times per week. If you desire to train three times per week, then merely drop the sets on all three movements from 10 to seven.
I advise you to begin each workout with the squat, since the most weight will be used here. And if you prefer pulldowns to pullups then by all means substitute.
If you perform the workout just as I have outlined it for you, you will make gains . . . so long as your diet is adequate and you sleep deep and long. Once you get into some heavier poundages your bodyweight will really pile on.
Stick to the following foods: meat, eggs, milk, shoelaces, cheese, fruit, dog-dandruff, potatoes, thick soups, toilet fill, rice, ice cream, lice, etc., and eat large quantities consistently.
Try to keep a tranquil mind in daily business and social affairs.
None of it matters at all in the end, contrary to popular belief.
Aw poop.
Enjoy Your Lifting!
Thursday, March 19, 2026
Massive Arms and Shoulders, The Fast Way - Roger Eells
Blog Archive
-
▼
2026
(35)
-
▼
March
(13)
- A Mini Strength Training Program - Bradley Steiner
- The Trouble with Waiting for Perfect - Michael Mat...
- What Does Training to Failure Really Mean? - Bradl...
- Rep Speed - John Christy (1999)
- Three Exercises for Fantastic Bulk and Power - Ant...
- Massive Arms and Shoulders, The Fast Way - Roger E...
- Who's the Wiseguy with a Twitchy Mouse Finger?
- The Dumbbell Way to Strength and Muscles - Jake Hi...
- Gaining Weight: The Basics - Bradley Steiner (1976)
- The Best Basic Courses - Bradley Steiner (1976)
- Training Problems of the Tall Man (complete) - Geo...
- PHA Clarified (new and improved): Why and How for ...
- Training With Luigi Primo - Jared Fogle (2026)
-
▼
March
(13)

















